Skip to main content

Full text of "Rolland Paper Company Ltd (1972)"

See other formats


Digitized by the Internet Archive 
in 2023 with funding from 
University of Alberta Library 


https://archive.org/details/Roll0550_ 1972 


table of contents 


Page 
Directors and Officers 2and3 
Highlights 4 
Directors’ Report 6 
Financial Statements 14 
Notes to Financial Statements 19 
Ten-Year Comparative Statistics 22 
Auditors’ Report 24 


The Annual General Meeting of 
Shareholders will be held at the Head 
Office of the Company, 800 Victoria 
Square, Suite 3620, Montreal, Quebec 
at 11:00 A.M., March 29, 1973. 


Si vous préférez recevoir votre rapport 
annuel en francais, priére d’écrire au 
Secrétaire, Compagnie de Papier 
Rolland, Limitée, 800, Place Victoria, 
Suite 3620, Montréal 115, Québec. 


45th annual report 


Rolland Paper Company, Limited 
Papermaking Specialists 


Head Office: 
800 Victoria Square, Suite 3620 
Montreal 115, Quebec 


Sales Offices: 
Montreal and Toronto 


Paper Mills: 
St. Jerome and Mont Rolland, Quebec 
and Scarborough, Ontario 


directors 


Hon. John B. Aird, Q.C. *Lucien G. Rolland, B.A., B.AsSeGaiGre: 
Partner, Edison, Aird & Berlis, President and General Manager 
Barristers and Solicitors Rolland Paper Company, Limited 
Toronto Montreal 
*G. Drummond Birks, B.Comm. Marc Rolland 

President, Henry Birks Retired Executive 

& Sons Limited St. Jerome 

Montreal 

Olivier Rolland 

Paul Chapdelaine, C.A. Retired Executive 

Retired Executive Montreal 

Montreal 

*Joseph A. Weldon, C.A., M.B.E. 

E. Jacques Courtois, Q.C. Vice-President and Financial 
Partner, Laing, Weldon, Courtois, Consultant 

Clarkson, Parsons, Gonthier & Tétrault, | Rolland Paper Company, Limited 
Barristers and Solicitors Montreal 

Montreal 


Richard A. Irwin 

Chairman of the Board 
Consolidated-Bathurst, Limited 
Montreal 


Herménégilde A. LeBlanc, C.A. 
Secretary, Rolland Paper Company, 
Limited 

Montreal 


*Gérard Plourde, M.Comm. 
Chairman of the Board, UAP Inc. 
Montreal 


*Albert Rolland 
Vice-President and Marketing 
Consultant 
Rolland Paper Company, Limited 
Laval *Member of the Executive Committee. 


officers 


Lucien G. Rolland 


President and General Manager 


Joseph A. Weldon 


Vice-President and Financial 


Consultant 


Albert Rolland 


Vice-President and Marketing 


Consultant 


Jean-Louis Chollet, Eng. 
Executive Vice-President, 


Book and Fine Papers Division 


Hugh M. Craig, B.Sc., Ph.D. 


Executive Vice-President, 
Coated Papers Division 


Bruno Julien, B.A., M.A., M.B.A. 
Vice-President — Personnel 


Alphonse St. Jacques, M.Comm., C.A. 
Vice-President and Treasurer 


Herménégilde A. LeBlanc 


Secretary 


Michel Gagnon, M.Comm., C.A. 


Controller 


Transfer Agents 
Montreal Trust Company 
Royal Trust Company 


Registrars 
Canadian Trust Company 
Bankers Trust Company 


Shares Listing 
Montreal Stock Exchange 
Toronto Stock Exchange 


Auditors 
Touche, Ross & Co. 


highlights 


Net sales 
Net earnings 
Per class ‘“‘A’’ share 
Per class ‘‘B”’ share 
Dividends on class ‘‘A’”’ and “‘B”’ shares 
Per class ‘‘A’’ share 
Per class ‘‘B”’ share 
Cash Flow 
Per class ‘‘A’’ share 
Per class ‘‘B”’ share 
Book Value per class ‘‘A”’ and ‘‘B”’ shares 
Working Capital 
Long-term Debt 
Capital Expenditures 


Voie 
$46,437,380 
1,388,650 
0.73 

0.68 


160,002 
0.10 
0.05 


2,955,419 
1.37 
ie32 


9.53 
9,649,119 
7,393,000 

635,950 


Voie 
$41,555,060 
1S0s7a 
0.05 

0.05 


1,088,887 
0.56 
0.56 


8.90 
8,385,167 
7,900,500 

297,388 


tors ‘report to the sharcholdess 


irec 


d 


ees 


directors report to the sharcholders 


Sales and Earnings 

Consolidated net sales of $46.4 million 
were substantially up from $41.6 
million in 1971 and reached a new 
record level in the Company’s history. 
The 11.5% increase in sales revenue 
was mostly due to a sizeable increase 
in our shipments to the domestic 
market and was in line with the 
experience of other Canadian 

fine paper mills. 


Consolidated net earnings of 
$1,389,000 for the year 1972 showed 
a considerable improvement over 
earnings of $150,000 last year. They 
represented $0.73 per class ‘‘A’’ share 
and $0.68 per class ‘‘B”’ share, 
compared with $0.05 per class ‘‘A”’ 
and “‘B”’ shares in 1971. 


Economic Environment 

1972 has been an encouraging year. 
The Canadian economy recovered 
from its depressed state of the 
preceding two years, allowing for 

a stronger demand for Canadian fine 
papers and more stable market 
conditions. 


The fine paper industry, much like the 
rest of the pulp & paper industry, is 
cyclical and demand for its products 
varies with the economic environment. 
A buoyant economy generates more 
disposable income, heavier consumer 
spending and a stronger demand for 


advertising and printing materials. 
Throughout 1972, consumption of 
writing and printing papers, including 
such converting grades as envelope 
and register papers, grew 11%. 


It is only towards the end of the year 
that the stronger demand in the 
domestic as well as in the American 
fine paper markets resulted in a more 
stable price situation. 


During 1970 and 1971 Canadian fine 
paper manufacturers were faced with 
a large inflow of American products. 
Some of these were available at prices 
substantially below those of Canadian 
mills, resulting in a disruption of the 
domestic price structure and severe 
price competition. 


This situation had arisen following 

a weakening of the North American 
demand for fine papers and an excess 
capacity of American mills at a time 
when the Canadian market was static. 
In 1969, the Canadian government 
had fully implemented the 44% tariff 
reductions agreed to under the 
General Agreement on Tariffs and 
Trade, and unpegged the Canadian 
Dollar in 1970, making our market 
more accessible to foreign 
manufacturers. 


The recovery of the American 
economy in 1972 generated a stronger 
demand within the United States and 
reduced the availability of products 
for export to the Canadian market. 
Furthermore, longer delivery dates, 
together with higher American prices 
and the near parity between the 
Currencies of both countries, all 
contributed to make American manu- 
factured goods less attractive at this 
particular time in Canada. 


These developments occurred 
gradually throughout 1972 benefiting 
all of our divisions, especially during 
the last quarter. 


Book and Fine Papers Division 

This division made a strong recovery. 
Following a general improvement and 
a higher penetration of the Ontario 
market, domestic sales increased by 
13%. The marketing team was 
strengthened; new grades were 
introduced to broaden its product line 
in offset papers and selective price 
increases were announced. Its in- 
volvement in the U.S. market was 
reduced by 50%. 


New contracts were negotiated with 
our pulp suppliers and important 
savings over the prices paid in 1971 
were effected. Higher productivity was 
achieved through improvements to our 
Nos. 7 and 8 paper machines and 

an extension of our on-line control 
systems through the use of the 
process computer. Furthermore, we 
benefited from the aggressive cost 
reduction programme effected in 

1971 and 1972. The mills in St. Jerome 
and Mont Rolland, however, only 
operated at an average of 78.3% of 
capacity. These factors were respon- 
sible for a return on capital employed 
which, although still unsatisfactory, 

far exceeded that of the two previous 
years. 


Coated Papers Division 
Improvements in manufacturing, 
warehousing and marketing 
accounted for a turnaround in 
this division. 


Pursuant to the reorganization of the 
Company in January 1972, a separate 
sales force was established for the 
marketing of coated products. This 
approach generated moves to improve 
the grade mix and increased the sale 
of more profitable grades. New 
products were launched and old ones 
modified to make our Imperial Offset 
the first complete line of No. 1 coated 
products in Canada. New inventory 


management procedures and a 
reorganization of our warehouse 
facilities contributed to an improve- 
ment in service to our customers. 
Programmes to increase productivity 
and improve production flow were 
implemented. 


Wholesale Distributors Division 

This division operates two Companies: 
Fine Papers, Limited and The Wilson- 
Munroe Company Limited in Toronto, 
Montreal and Sudbury. It specializes 
in the distribution of fine paper and 
related products. The overall per- 
formance for 1972 was good. Their 
sales increased at a rate which 
improved their market share. 


Fine Papers, Limited is now a 
profitable operation and provides 
tax savings resulting from a loss 
carry-forward. 


Financial 

During the past year, a combination 
of higher earnings and continued 
restraint in cash outlays for capital 
expenditures and dividend disburse- 
ments greatly enhanced the financial 
position of the Company, which had 
deteriorated in the two previous years. 


The cash flow of $2,555,000 was 
$1,467,000 higher than in 1971 and 
represented $1.37 per class ‘‘A’’ share 
mainly as a result of the improvement 
in net earnings. It enabled us to add 
$1,264,000 to working capital which 
stood at $9,649,000 at December 31, 
1972. Short-term investment increased 
by $906,000 to $1,106,000 while 
accounts receivable and accounts 
payable increased appreciably with 
the larger volume of sales in 1972. 


During the recession years of 1970 
and 1971, capital expenditures were 
drastically reduced. During 1972, the 
net amount spent on capital improve- 
ments was $564,000, compared with 
$270,000 in 1971. 


An amount of $434,000 was disbursed 
to purchase, for cancellation, $209,500 
of the 4%2 % Sinking Fund bonds and 
$275,000 of the 534% Sinking Fund 
debentures, at a saving of $51,000. 

At December 31, 1972, our long-term 
debt stood at $7,393,000. 


Our investment in 125,000 shares of 
Consolidated-Bathurst Limited pro- 
duced no income in 1972, but since 
last year, prospects of this company 
are brighter. After substantial write- 
offs, the profits for 1972 showed a 
marked improvement. Dividends on 
the preferred shares have been 
resumed and a reduction of arrears 
on these dividends has been initiated. 


The market value of this investment 
has more than doubled during the 
year and stood at $2.1 million at 
December 31st. While this is con- 
siderably lower than the purchase 
price of $5.9 million, no provision has 
been taken in our financial statements 
to cover the difference between the 
purchase price and the market value. 
Although nothing precludes the 
Company from disposing of this asset, 
it has not been regarded as a short- 
term investment and accordingly was 
never included in current assets. 


Your Company’s overall return on 
capital employed, defined as the sum 
of working capital, investment and net 
fixed assets, was 4.7% in 1972. This 
rate of return is much improved when 
compared to the two previous years, 
but it is still well below the 9% level 
reached in the early sixties. Therefore, 
the increased earnings in 1972 do not 
mean full financial recovery and 
satisfactory levels of profitability. 


Dividends 

Payment of dividends on our common 
shares, omitted since the previous 
payment on September 1, 1970, was 
resumed in 1972 with payments of 
interim dividends of $0.05 per class 
‘A’ shares on August 15th and 
December 15th, and of $0.05 per 
class ‘‘B”’ shares on December 15th. 
Total common and preferred dividend 
disbursements amounted to $220,000 
in 1972. Rates of dividends will be 
reviewed from time to time in the light 
of the progress in our profit recovery. 
The payment of reasonable dividends 
to our shareholders is considered very 
important. However, the resources 
necessary to a steady expansion of 
Our Operations and of our earnings 
must be retained in the Company. 


10 


Personnel ; 

This past year was the first under 
the new corporate structure which 
recognized our coated papers 
division, our book and fine papers 
operation and our distribution 
companies as three independent 
profit centres. Such an approach 
provided your Company with a much 
better control of its investments 
through a close coordination of 
marketing and production. It also 
favoured long-term programmes, 
research and product development 
and manpower planning. The per- 
sonnel of each of these divisions, with 
the support of the head office group, 
tackled their new objectives with 
initiative and efficiency. 


A new labour agreement with the em- 
ployees of our book and fine papers 
division was negotiated for a two-year 
period ending April 30, 1974. This met 
the needs of the Company for a longer 
contract than the rest of the fine paper 
industry and reflected the fact that our 
employees and their representatives 
were fully aware of this necessity. 


An unresolved problem is that the 
wage rates and fringe benefits paid 
in the Canadian fine paper industry 
are materially higher than those paid 
for corresponding jobs in the U.S. 
fine paper mills. This seriously 
restricts our ability to compete with 


American producers in our own market 
as well as in the U.S.A., and our ability 
to reinvest larger amounts in the 
business. 


At date of writing, negotiations with 
the hourly-paid employees of our 
coated papers division are in progress. 
Everything is being done so that a 

new satisfactory collective agreement 
will be signed shortly. 


Environment 

Pollution abatement continued to be 
One of Our prime concerns. Since 
1968, your Company has been actively 
involved ina programme of effluent 
control at our St. Jerome and Mont 
Rolland mills. Substantial improve- 
ments have been achieved. The 
amount of suspended solids in our 
waste water now stands at 1.8% of 
production for our St. Jerome opera- 
tions and 1.6% for Mont Rolland, as 
against the 2% standard established 
by the Quebec Water Board. This is 
but a first step in our programme. 

In anticipation of more stringent 
standards, we are now considering 
further treatment systems to reduce 
the amount of suspended solids. 
Estimated costs are $1.2 million which 
will bring our total investments to 
reduce pollution to more than 

$1.7 million. 


Such investments for pollution control 
will represent increased operating 
charges for your Company of more 
than $135,000 per year. These are 
required at a time when vital expen- 
ditures must be incurred to assure our 
competitiveness and profitability 
within the new situation brought about 
by the 1969 tariff reductions. In 
assessing these additional operating 
expenses, it must be remembered that 
the unsatisfactory profit experience of 
the past two years made it impossible 
to justify the financing of new projects. 


This underlines the need for more 
comprehensive fiscal and financial 
aid programmes to help companies 
achieve the desired standards. In this 
respect, the industry has made 
recommendations to the Government 
in order to permit an increased capital 
cost allowance for capital expenditures 
on pollution abatement. The time 
schedule defined by governments 

to attain new standards is also of 
prime importance. 


Outlook 

Economic expansion is expected to 
continue in 1973. The prospects are 
for a buoyant level of retail sales, a 
reduction in personal income tax and 
sustained real growth. All these factors 
have a direct positive correlation on 
the increased consumption levels of 
fine and printing papers. Industry 
sales should reflect this growth and 
our mills should operate at higher 
levels of capacity. In view of the 
depressed conditions of past years, 
very few new installations have been 
planned and operating ratios should 
improve over the next two years. The 
possible reduction of the tax rate for 
Canadian manufacturing companies 
should contribute to improve the 
competitiveness of Canadian manu- 
facturers. However, the Federal 
Government's plan to stimulate 
employment through tax reductions 
on personal income, and increased 
spending could bring a resurgence 
of inflationary pressures which might 
upset this bright outlook. Cost 
increases could outpace our pro- 
ductivity and our ability to secure 
prices for our products which would 
reflect past and future cost increases. 
A final but most important factor will 
be the policies adopted by the Federal 
authorities vis-a-vis our industry. 


The relationship between the Canadian 
and the American fine paper markets 
remains a source of concern for the 
long-term profitability of our industry. 
This problem having been reported 
and discussed at length on several 
occasions, it will suffice to underline 
that Canadian manufacturers remain 
at a disadvantage with their American 
competitors whether in the domestic 
or in the American market. 


11 


Canadian production costs are pro- 
portionately higher because of higher 
wages and shorter runs than those in 
corresponding American fine paper 
mills. The American manufacturers 
enjoy much more effective protection 
against imports; they benefit from 
special export arrangements such 

as D.I.S.C. and their overall tax rate 
is lower than the Canadian rate. 


It is urgent that we protect more 
adequately the domestic Canadian 
fine paper industry whether it be 
against imports of basic fine paper or, 
especially, of printed material, while 
maintaining export opportunities. 
American authorities are definitely 
taking a more rigid stand vis-a-vis 
Canadian fine paper imports. 


All employees worked in an excep- 
tional fashion throughout the year. 
Your Directors wish to underline their 
record of accomplishment and to 
thank them sincerely for the role they 
played in moving from the problems 
of the last two years to the healthier 
position of 1972. 


1972 has marked the 90th anniversary 
of this Company and its predecessor 
in the production and marketing of 
fine papers in Canada. Such a long 
experience has taught us that only 

the best is good enough for our 
Customers, Our Suppliers, our em- 
ployees and all those who come in 
contact with our organization. It is with 
that spirit that we are continuing to 
tackle the interesting challenges in 
our future. 


On behalf of the Board of Directors, 


ee) een 


Lucien G. Rolland, 
President and General Manager 


Montreal, January 31, 1973 


12 


: 

| 
ae 
eT I 
ae 


S ee 
CNH c 
i 


Be a 
See a os ta - 
nee OS Eke See 


a 


ia 
Ca eee 
SS Rianne 


oe 


(cs 


I 


a eee 
Ver ae 


ie We 
Nii, 


mac _aaaer aie (pms os wea ats omer once Te 
| Co oo 
hls os | 


etc el Aa ee NA 


pal 
AV 
Ht 


TIE 
Za 
ae Tt 
aa a. 
[i= 
a 
S$ 


Ce 
fi ,t— 


| 
/ 


(a 


S, 


rolland paper company, limited 


Statement of Consolidated Income and Expense 


Year ended December 31 


1972 1971 

Net Sales $46,437,380 $41,555,060 

Cost of sales 37,728,997 35,787,099 

Gross profit 8,708,383 5,767,961 

Selling and administrative expenses 4,647,102 3,941,339 
Depreciation 1,313,141 1,292,146 © 

Bond interest 435,905 458,691 

6,396,148 5,692,176 

2,312,235 (oes 

Interest and other income 170,571 194,380 

Earnings before income taxes 2,482,806 270,165 

Income taxes 1,094,156 119,994 

Net earnings for the year $ 1,388,650 > °S saa 


oo 
———— ee 


Net earnings per share — Note 9 
Per Class ‘‘A”’ share $ \ OER SNe 0.05 
Per Class ‘‘B’”’ share 0.68 0.05 


14 


4 
. 


tolland paper company, limited 


Statement of Consolidated Source and Application of Funds 


Source of Funds 
Cash flow from operations 
Net earnings 
Depreciation 
Deferred income taxes 


Application of Funds 
Capital expenditures — net 
Long-term debt reduction 
Dividends 


Increase in Working Capital 


Working Capital 


Year ended December 31 


1972 


$ 1,388,650 
1,313,141 
(146,372) 


$ 2,555,419 


$ 563,530 
507,500 
220,437 


1,291,467 
1,263,952 
$ 2,555,419 


$ 9,649,119 


1971 


Di 1501 74 
1,292,146 


(353,430) 


> 1,088,887 


& 270,267 
124,000 
60,435 


454,702 


___ 834,185 
$ 1,088,887 


$ 8,385,167 


rolland paper company, limited 


Consolidated Balance Sheet 


assets 
At December 31 
1972 1971 
Current 
Cash $ 175,009 $ 241,048 
Short-term investments at cost, which is equivalent to market value 1,106,267 200,022 
Accounts receivable 6,250,337 4,994,638 
Inventories — Note 2 6,986,375 6,716,093 
Prepaid expenses 167,854 157,619 
14,685,842 12,309,420 
Investment at Cost — Note 3 5,862,651 5,862,651 


$n OE eee 
Fixed 


Property, plant and equipment — Note 4 14,008,831 14,758,442 


Excess of consideration for acquisition of shares 
of subsidiaries over their book value 588,647 588,647 


$35,145,971 $33,519,160 


On behalf of the Board: 
Lucien G. Rolland, Director 
J. A. Weldon, Director 


liabilities 


At December 31 


1972 1971 
Current 
Bank indebtedness, secured $ 403,918 $ 433,206 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 3,919,146 3,105,601 
Income taxes payable 690,659 385,446 
Long-term debt instalment due within one year 23,000 oe 
5,036,723 3,924,253 
Long-Term Debt — Note 5 7,393,000 7,900,500 
Deferred Income Taxes 3,696,119 3,842,491 
Shareholders’ Equity 
Capital — Note 6 
Authorized 
24,800 Preferred shares of $100 each issuable in one or more series 
2,400,000 Class “‘A’”’ and 800,000 Class ‘‘B” shares without 
nominal or par value 
Issued 
14,220 4% % Cumulative redeemable preferred shares $ 1,422,000 
1,360,016 Class ‘‘A” and 
480,008 Class ‘'B’’ shares 7,162,683 
8,584,683 
Retained Earnings — For use in the business — Note 7 10,435,446 19,020,129 17,851,916 


$35,145,971 $33,519,160 


ig 


rolland paper company, limited 


Statement of Consolidated Retained Earnings 


Tee 


Year ended December 31 


1972 
Retained Earnings at Beginning of Year $ 9,267,233 
Net earnings for the year 1,388,650 
10,655,883 

Dividends 
Preferred shares 60,435 
Class ‘‘A’’ shares 136,002 
Class “‘B’’ shares 24,000 
220,437 


hoa 
$ 9,177,497 


190,174 


9,327,668 


60,435 


60,435 


OT EEE eee 


Retained Earnings at End of Year $10,435,446 


18 


$ 9,267,233 


j 


tolland paper company, limited 


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1972 


note | Principles of Consolidation 


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rolland Paper 
Company, Limited and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Canada Glazed Papers 
Limited, Fine Papers, Limited and The Wilson-Munroe Company Limited. 
The 1971 comparative figures in the Consolidated statement of income 

and expense were reclassified to conform with the 1972 presentation. 


note 2 Inventories, at the lower of cost and net realizable value 


Finished paper and paper in process 
Raw materials, wires, felts and supplies 
Repair parts and maintenance materials 


note b Investment at Cost 


This investment consisting of 125,000 common shares of Consolidated-Bathurst 
Limited is not considered by the Company to be of a current nature. Market 
quotations of $16.75 per share at December 31, 1972 and of $7.875 at 
December 31, 1971 indicated values at those dates of $2,093,750 and 


$984,375. 

Accumulated 
note 4 Property, Plant and Equipment Cost Depreciation 
Machinery and equipment $25,444,048 $15,606,894 
Buildings 6,563,607 3,194,441 
Leasehold improvements 202,168 154,262 
Water power 300,000 15,000 
Land 3 419,605 Ue 

$32,979,428 $18,970,597 


Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method in the manufacturing 
companies and the diminishing balance method in the wholesale distributor 


companies. 


1972 1971 

$ 4,997,437 $ 4,516,047 
1,467,527 1,731,141 
521,411 468,905 

$ 6,986,375. $ 6,716,093 
Net Net 

1972 1971 

$ 9,837,154 $10,400,848 
3,369,166 3,520,318 
97,906 105,324 
285,000 300,000 
419,605 431,955 
$14,008,831 $14,758,442 


SS, 


a eee 


note § Long-Term Debt 


Rolland Paper Company, Limited 


First Mortgage Bonds 
4V2% Sinking Fund Bonds due January 2, 1975 


Deduct 


Bonds redeemed and cancelled including $507,000 in 
anticipation of future Sinking Fund Requirements. 


Sinking Fund Debentures 
5% % due July 2, 1984 
Deduct 


Debentures redeemed and cancelled 
including $277,000 in anticipation of future 
Sinking Fund Requirements 


Deduct 


Instalment due within one year included 
in current liabilities 


$ 


1974 
294,500 


300,000 


$ 4,000,000 


3,507,000 


7,500,000 


577,000 


1975 
$ 198,500 


300,000 


19%2 


$ 493,000 


6,923,000 


7,416,000 


23,000 


$ 7,393,000 


\ 
\ 
\ 


After 1975 
$ Aisa 


aa ara TN Bs tse UNE Yt Ree ee 


Future Sinking Fund Requirements 1973 
472% First Mortgage Bonds $ — 

5% % Sinking Fund 
Debentures 23,000 
5 23,000 


The declaration of dividends and the redemption of preferred shares of 
Rolland Paper Company, Limited are restricted if such declaration or 
redemption result in a reduction of the working capital of the Company 


to an amount less than $2,000,000. 


20 


i Ee ae 


17a 


$ 702,500 


7,198,000 


7,900,500 


— 


$ 7,900,500 


Total 
$ 493,000 


6,923,000 


ee 


$ 7,416,000 


——_—_—_—— SESS EE SSS 


note © capita 


The preferred shares of the 4% % series are redeemable at $104 per share 
and are non-voting unless four quarterly dividends are in arrears. Class ‘‘A’’ 
shares are non-voting unless the Company shall fail, for a period of two 
consecutive years, to pay any dividend on such shares. 


Class “A’’ shares are entitled to a non-cumulative dividend at the rate of 10 
cents per share per annum before payment of any dividend on Class ‘‘B”’ 
shares. If in any fiscal year dividends at the rate of 5 cents per share per 
annum are paid on Class ‘‘B”’ shares, any further distribution in respect of 
that fiscal year shall be made equally, share for share, upon all outstanding 
Class “‘A”’ and Class ‘‘B”’ shares. 


note 7 retained Earnings 


An amount of $258,000 of retained earnings is restricted under Section 62 of 
the Canada Corporations Act as a result of the redemption of 2,580 preferred 
shares in past years. 


mote 8 directors’ and Officers’ Remuneration 


Aggregate remuneration to persons who served as Directors and as Officers 
of Rolland Paper Company, Limited at any time during the year was as follows: 


1972 1971 

Remuneration paid by: 12 Directors/9 Officers 12 Directors/9 Officers 

Rolland Paper Company, Limited $ 32,100 $ 258,800 $ 30,800°s 232) -222)700 
Subsidiary Company 

Canada Glazed Papers Limited 2,200 — 2,700 a 

| S684: 300. 1) $11'\258,800 Si ess SOU cre Gn 2227700 


Four Officers were also Directors of the Company in 1972 and 1971. 


note 9 net Earnings per Share 


The net earnings per share in 1972 was calculated after taking into account 
the differential in the dividends paid during the year to the Class “A” and 
Class ‘‘B” shares. No dividends were paid on these shares in 1971. 


note iO Long-Term Leases 


The Company’s commitments under lease agreements of various terms for 
property and equipment aggregate $2,288,000 at December 31, 1972. The 
annual rentals in 1973 under these leases will be $420,000. 


21 


ten-year comparative statistics 


———__ See 


1972 
Sales and Earnings 
Net sales $46,437,380 
Dividend income rig 
Depreciation 1,313,141 
Bond interest 435,905 
Earnings (loss) before income taxes ; 2,482,806 
Income taxes 1,094,156 
Net earnings (loss) 1,388,650 
Cash flow 2,555,419 
Percentage of net earnings (loss) to net sales 3.0% 
Percentage of net earnings (loss) to capital employed 4.6% 
Distribution of Earnings 
Dividend on preferred shares $ 60,435 
Dividend on class ‘‘A’’ and ‘‘B”’ shares 160,002 
Retained in the business 1,168,213 
a ea eS ee 
Per Share* 
Net earnings (loss) per class ‘‘A’’ share $ 0.73 
Dividend per class ‘‘A’’ share 0.10 
Cash flow per class ‘‘A’”’ share 1.37 
Book value per class ‘‘A” and ‘‘B”’ shares 9.53 
Financial 
Net assets: 
Working capital $ 9,649,119 
Investment in securities 5,862,651 
Fixed assets, net 7 14,008,831 
Other assets 588,647 
Capital employed 30,109,248 
Financed by: 
Long-term debt 7,393,000 
Deferred income taxes 3,696,119 
Preferred shareholders’ equity 1,422,000 
Class ‘‘A” and “‘B”’ shareholders’ equity 17,598,129 
Total capitalization 30,109,248 
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities 2.9:1 
Capital expenditures $ 635,950 


ae a IR a TTA EIST er iniciiciremrer en re e ia eB EE 


Other Statistics 


Number of shareholders 2,256 
Number of employees 1,294 
TED crim eae ee wwe 
NOTE: 


Results of Canada Glazed Papers Limited are included from February 24, 1964, 
results of Fine Papers, Limited from January 1, 1970 and results of 
The Wilson-Munroe Company Limited from January 1, 1971. 


22 


ROTA 


458,691 


$ 8,385,167 


5,862,651 5,862,651 
14,758,442 | 15,780,321 
588,647 588,647 


29,594,907 | 29,982,604 


$41,555,060 | $34,084,751 |$35,647,256 
ws 125,000 
1,292,146 1,206,907 


520,189 


270,165 2.9195 VF 
119,994 1,443,743 
LoOy1 7 1,536,074 
1,088,887 2,665,881 
0.4% 4.3% 
0.5% 4.8% 


$ 60,435/$ 60,435 
534,007 712,009 
(1,016,313) 763,630 


9 /, 100,985 4% 9'901,323 
5,862,651 
15,934,251 

207,319 


31,955,540 


1969 | 


1968 


$34,903,154 
125,000 
1,216,595 
544,214 
2,645,318 
1,238,949 
1,406,369 
2,486,965 
4.0% 
44% 


$ 60,435 
712,009 


633,925 


1967 


$32,880,771 
250,000 
1,148,587 
569,739 
3,612,328 
1,723,463 
1,888,865 
3,061,031 
1 Yo 
5.9% 


61,513 
712,009 
1,115,343 


7,900,500 8,024,500 


8,751,000 


3,842,491 4,195,921 4,426,044 
1,422,000 1,422,000 1,422,000 
16,429,916 | 16,340,183 | 17,356,496 


29,594,907 
Sale| 


29,982,604 
Pa 


3: 297,388'13 693,710 
2,320 2,377 
1,285 289 


31,955,540 


$ 841,311 


Sos] 


2,330 
1,288 


$ 9,734,780 | $ 9,680,578 
5,862,651| 5,862,651 
16,176,079} 16,136,194 
— 88,662 
31,773,510 | 31,768,085 
9,255,500| 9,748,000 
4,503,144} 4,639,144 
1,422,000} 1,422,000 
mIB G2 .008 S008 Se! 
31,773,510 | 31,768,085 
4.2:1 2.9:1 
$ 1,261,104 |$ 1,639,203 

2,330 

1,325 


*Net earnings, dividend and cash flow per class ‘‘B”’ 
share are 5 cents less than per class ‘‘A’’ share 
except in 1970 when the differential is 4 cents 


and in 1971 when there is no differential. 


1966 


$29,935,187 
262,500 
1,072,238 
597,001 
2,994 320 
1,265,915 
1,728,405 
3,993,637 
5.8% 
5500 


$ 64,993 
712,009 


951,403 


> 9,522,411 
5,862,651 
1,69 19253 
118,848 


31,155,163 


10,217,000 
4,615,565 
1,479,000 

14,843,598 


Sioa, 10S 


SN 
Stile los4co 


1965 1964 


$28,290,544 | $26,032,008 
184,375 


817,640 698,358 
638,021 372,386 
3,297,750 2,759,939 
15312424 1,420,628 
1,766,326, Tesgots 
4,115,390 2,397,169 
6.2% 5.1% 
5.8% 6.1% 


71,400 71,400 

490,507 408,007 

1,204,419 859,904 

1.00} $ 0.90 

0.30 0.30 

2.36 1.63 

8.02 4.69 

$ 8,408,378 | $ 5,542,112 
5,862,651 ae 

15,500,429; 11,211,744 

490,308 5,153,000 

30,261,766 | 21,906,856 

11,267,000} 11,879,500 

3,422,571 1,522,231 

1,680,000 1,680,000 

13,892,195 6825.02 

30,261,766 | 21,906,856 

3.6:1 2:37 

$ 5,154,185 | $ 3,011,934 

2,331 


1,121 


1965 per share calculated on average number 
of shares for the year. 


1963 


$20,633,530 
559,077 
144,654 
2,586,179 
1,310,063 
1,276,116 
1,948,293 
6.2% 

9.7% 


$ 71,400 
408,007 
796,709 


$ 5,066,795 
8,128,535 


13,195,330 


3,077,000 
1,117,600 
1,680,000 
7,320,730 


13,195,330 


2.9:1 
$ 591,885 


1,889 
877 


23 


auditors report 
to the sharcholdess 


The Shareholders, 
Rolland Paper Company, Limited, 
Montreal, Que. 


We have examined the consolidated 
balance sheet of Rolland Paper 
Company, Limited and its subsidiaries 
as at December 31, 1972 and the 
consolidated statements of income and 
expense, retained earnings and source 
and application of funds for the year 
then ended. Our examination included 
a general review of the accounting 
procedures and such tests of 
accounting records and other 
supporting evidence as we considered 
necessary in the circumstances. 


In Our opinion these consolidated 
financial statements present fairly the 
financial position of the companies as 
at December 31, 1972 and the results 
of their operations and the source and 
application of their funds for the year 
then ended, in accordance with 
generally accepted accounting 
principles applied on a basis consistent 
with that of the preceding year. 


TOUCHE, ROSS & GO. 
Chartered Accountants 


haut Alera ‘ bo. 


Montreal, Que. 
January 29, 1973. 


24 


tolland and its products 


100.4 


26 


its products 


Paper is as old as civilization — as 
new as the latest product of 20th 
Century research. During this long 
span of years, thousands of products 
and commodities, once familiar and 
essential, have vanished — but paper 
remains, its demand increasing 

every year. 


23.35. 
102M 


1,000 


BLANC -BRILLANT 
BRIGHT - WHITE 
REF 
GRAIN LONG 


WHITE 


BLANC 


all 


It is precisely this survival in the face 
of centuries of social and economic 
change that poses the greatest 
challenge to a fine paper manu- 
facturer. It is easier, and more 
compelling, to respond to radical 
changes in technology than it is to 
sense the more subtle changes in 
customer requirements for a product 
that everyone takes for granted, and 
to react accordingly. 


Rolland has met this challenge in two 
basic ways: by being in the forefront 
in the technology of production; and 
by ensuring, through research, that 
the products we manufacture are 
those that not only satisfy our 
customers’ technical requirements, 
but meet, and even anticipate, 
changes in demand for specific 
grades of paper. 


In 1968, Rolland installed the first 
on-line production control system by 
computer in the Canadian fine paper 
industry. This enabled us to turn out 
paper of uniform quality, with respect 
to such variables as thickness, weight 
and moisture content — problems 
which have long plagued the printer. 


Backing up this technological 
leadership is strong emphasis on 
customer requirements, and sensitivity 
to shifts in the demand for various 


28 


grades of paper. Some of these 
changes are brought about by the 
printing industry itself, others by 
the influence of designers. 


For example, in recent years, printers 
have swung over from letterpress to 
offset printing. Sensing this change, 
Rolland undertook a firm commitment 
providing products required for the 
offset process. This has found 
expression in a number of new brands 
— Rolland Offset, Rolland Opaque, 
New Imperial Offset Enamel and, 
most recently, Rolland Tints. In some 
instances, these brands were inno- 
vations in their field. The Rolland 
family of offset papers now satisfies 
the requirements of offset printing. 


The recent introduction of Rolland 
Tints is an example of response to 
designer-initiated change. More and 
more, designers are turning to 
coloured stock as the nucleus of 
new, even startling, innovations in 
the graphic arts. To meet their needs, 
and to stay in the forefront of this 
expanding market, we introduced 
this wide new range of coloured 
offset papers. 


But dedication to the offset market 
has inno way made us lose sight of 
the more specialized needs of groups 
of people within the total fine paper 


market. Superfine Linen Record, our 
100% rag content bond paper, is still 
unquestionably the finest letterhead 
paper on the Canadian market. 
Rockland Bond, the all-purpose 
sulphite bond, satisfies dozens of 
basic needs for business and 
industry. Dactypost, Canada’s leading 
posting ledger paper, is an essential 
part of thousands of accounting 
systems. Zephyr Antique Book, makes 
for the restful reading of novels and 
textbooks. Duocoat Label identifies 
packages and containers of all kinds. 
There is also a wide variety of fancy- 
coated and specialty papers of many 
kinds — gift-wrap papers for special 
occasions and seasons, box-top 
papers for packaging merchandise, 
and a host of others. 


These are just a few of the many 
brands that make up Rolland’s full 
line of fine papers, coated and 
uncoated — our response to a 
demand which is over a thousand 
years old, and still growing. So long 
as the demand for paper endures, 
we will continue to meet its require- 
ments. In fact, should paper ever be 
Superseded by another substance, 
we will meet that demand, too — our 
real dedication is to serving the needs 
of the market. 


ee) 


30 


E SIECLE 


DE 
IVATION 
ESSAI 


ikonon Conptantes 177 
| i @ YEP 


fim eeadiitiinnenn, HOMME 


EBI le 
: CANADA ANGLA E 
un APFRONTEME N 


haeagut so Beton Sars. 
eae ie a eee font 2 PEE Soe es Won te ES 
vein Nae Tha EASON I. bh Ose gape 


INGANIE | JACQUES FE 


YRMARS 


£ANIM 


Gilles Marcotte 


TTERATURE | 
)UI SE FAIT 


Reed pee FeANC Ate 


niet task deta ee = P| assent ; : LES TRIBUNAL 
: | oe ET LA CO 
eee 


their uses 


A world without paper would be a 
world unable to function. 


If the statement seems an exaggera- 
tion, consider just that situation. 
Paper has suddenly, inexplicably, 
vanished from the earth. No books 

to peruse for pleasure, or study for 
self-betterment. No letterhead for 
communication. No labels to identify 
products. No forms or cards to 
activate computers. Think of the 
computer in particular. Its technology 
is one of the most sophisticated ever 
devised by man; yet, deprived of 
paper, it would be virtually useless 

in its present form. 


To appreciate the importance of paper 
in your day-to-day life, imagine 
yourself, fora moment, as head of 

a typical family going about its 
business on any typical day. 


In the morning, your wife opens up 

a can of tomato juice, which is 
attractively identified by a colourful 
label printed on Duocoat. As she does 
so, she is conscious that she has 
opened the last can, and reaches 

for her shopping memo pad, printed 
on Rockland Bond. 


Off to work — and you shove a 
novel, printed on Belvedere 

Opaque Litho, into your pocket for 
reading on the commuter train. 
Arrived at the office, you go through 
the morning mail, which includes 
several letters from customers; three 
letterheads are on Colonial Bond and 
one on Rolland Parchment. You 
dictate the replies, and your secretary 
types them on your company's 
letterhead, which is printed on 
Superfine Linen Record. 


Turning to a pile of orders, detailed 
on inter-office forms printed on 
Rockland Bond, you pass them for 
processing through the accounting 
department, where they are machine 
posted on Dactypost. Later, at lunch, 
you choose from a menu printed on 
Rolland Offset. 


31 


‘a Camporlts 


ag 


CVA 


CSA ok SR 
PAA SSS 94 BAL ER, 


a ai 


Meanwhile, let’s look at your son who 
is an art director in an advertising 
agency. One of the agency’s clients 
has called for a sharp, ultra-modern 
design for its annual report; and he 
experiments, to his own satisfaction, 
with Imperial Cover Stipple for the 
cover, Rolland Opaque for the 
non-financial section, and Rolland 
Tints for the financial section. 


Another son has even closer contact 
with Rolland papers. As press foreman 
in a printing shop, he uses a variety 

of them daily in many kinds of 

printing jobs — from sales brochures, 
to annual reports and product labels, 
among others. 


Your daughter in her last year of high 
school constantly refers during the 
day to her history, math and science 
textbooks, printed on Belvedere 
Opaque Litho, and Cashmere Book. 
After classes she helps print the 
itinerary for the ski weekend on a 
spirit duplicator, using Rolland 
Duplicating. 


Once the family had all left, your wife 
could turn her attention to wrapping 
your daughter's birthday presents, 
using some attractive gift-wrap made 
by Rolland’s Coated Papers Division. 
The mail brought two advertising 
circulars, printed on Rolland Offset; 
the new fire insurance policy, printed 
on Colonial Bond; and a message 


33 


34 


from one of the candidates for mayor 
in the next election, run off on an 
electrostatic copier, using Rolox 
Copy paper. 

In the evening, after dinner, you and 
your wife spend an hour poring over 
travel folders. You find it hard to make 
a choice — the full-colour pictures 

all look so inviting printed on Imperial 
Offset Enamel. 


Before calling it a day, you get in 
another hour reading your pocket 
book, while your wife gets started on 
a new Canadian novel — a hard-back 
edition printed on Cashmere Book, 
borrowed from the local lending 
library. 


During this single day, you and each 
member of your family were in direct 
or indirect contact with Rolland 
papers up to half a dozen times. 

Yet only your sons, because their 
jobs required it, were in any way 
conscious of that fact. 


It is this ubiquity of our products, and 
the wide variety of essential functions 
they make possible while remaining 
anonymous, that makes our business 
such a satisfying one to be in. It is 
also — in a sense — a responsibility 
that we assumed when we first began 
making paper. Those who use our 
papers can, and do, take their quality 
for granted. We cannot — and never 
will. 


35 


The cover of the Report is printed on 
Imperial Litho, White, Basis 420M, 
and the inside sections, on Imperial 
Offset Enamel, White, Basis 160M 
and Rolland Tints, African Tan, 
Basis 140M. 


eS ee eee 


SE